Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide
- First, a reality check (and a reality shield)
- 1) The forbidden-fruit effect (aka hybristophilia, minus the pop-culture glitter)
- 2) “Fame is a magnet,” and infamy is still fame
- 3) Parasocial intimacy: falling in love with the “edited” version of a person
- 4) Distance feels safer: control, boundaries, and the paradox of prison romance
- 5) The rescuer fantasy: “I can be the one who changes him”
- 6) Denial and “innocence stories”: when belief becomes a coping strategy
- 7) Attachment wounds: when “unavailable” partners feel strangely familiar
- 8) Trauma bonding and the addictive cycle of intermittent reward
- 9) Rebellion, identity, and belonging: the “us vs. them” bubble
- 10) Practical incentivesand the offender’s advantage in manipulation
- What this often looks like in real life (without the movie soundtrack)
- Healthy takeaways (even if you’re “just curious”)
- 500-Word Experiences: Stories People Describe When Loving the Infamous
- Conclusion
The short version: it’s complicated, it’s rare, and it’s not a “quirky dating preference” so much as a messy intersection of psychology, culture, vulnerability, and manipulation. The longer version? Grab a seatpreferably one that isn’t in a prison visiting roombecause we’re going to unpack what researchers and clinicians often point to when this headline-grabbing phenomenon shows up in real life.
One important boundary up front: explaining why something happens is not excusing it, and it’s definitely not romanticizing it. Serial murder is about victims, terror, and irreversible harm. This article focuses on the psychological and social dynamics that can pull a small number of people into relationships with extremely dangerous offendersoften from a distance, often through letters, and sometimes through marriage.
First, a reality check (and a reality shield)
Most women do not “want” serial killers. Most people are repelled by violence, not attracted to it. When marriage to a notorious killer does happen, it’s typically a tiny outlier case that draws intense media attentionso it feels bigger than it is.
Also, “women marry serial killers” is a headline that flattens a lot of different situations into one sensational sentence. Some spouses truly believe the person is innocent. Some are caught in long-running manipulation. Some are drawn to fame-by-proxy. Some are struggling with loneliness, trauma, or identity. And yes, in a few cases, sexual attraction to violent offenders is part of the picture. It’s not one storyit’s a stack of stories wearing the same trench coat.
1) The forbidden-fruit effect (aka hybristophilia, minus the pop-culture glitter)
There’s a term you’ll see in clinical and popular psychology discussions: hybristophilia, an attraction to someone who has committed outrageous or criminal acts. For a minority of people, “danger” doesn’t just register as a warning signit sparks arousal, fascination, or romantic obsession.
Why would that happen? Human attraction can be weirdly wired to intensity: adrenaline, taboo, and the feeling of being close to something “powerful.” It’s the same brain circuitry that makes some people binge horror movies (lights on, snacks in hand) while others can’t handle a movie trailer. The difference is that real violence isn’t entertainment, and attaching yourself to someone who harms others can become emotionally, legally, and physically devastating.
A key nuance: having an unusual attraction doesn’t automatically mean someone has a mental disorder. Clinical frameworks around paraphilic disorders generally hinge on distress/impairment or harm to others. In other words, “unusual” isn’t the same as “diagnosable”but it can still be risky, especially when the object of desire is manipulative and dangerous.
2) “Fame is a magnet,” and infamy is still fame
In a media ecosystem that can turn anyone into a spectacle, notorious offenders can become dark celebrities. Courtroom footage, documentaries, podcasts, dramatizations, and endless commentary can make a killer feel like a charactersomeone “known,” even if only through a curated narrative.
For some admirers, the offender’s notoriety acts like a spotlight: it creates the illusion of significance. Being “chosen” by someone infamous can feel like stepping onto a stage, especially for someone who has felt invisible in ordinary life. It’s a grim version of celebrity culture: a person becomes “special” because the world is watching the same villain they are.
That doesn’t mean the admirer consciously wants attention. Sometimes it’s subtler: the relationship provides a story that feels bigger than one’s own daily reality. When life feels small, messy, or lonely, attaching to something dramatic can feel like emotional oxygeneven if it’s toxic oxygen.
3) Parasocial intimacy: falling in love with the “edited” version of a person
Many of these relationships begin through letters, prison correspondence, or media exposure. That creates a powerful setup: intimacy without real-life friction. The admirer gets a steady stream of words, confessions, flattery, and vulnerabilitywhile the offender controls what is revealed and what is hidden.
Unlike everyday datingwhere you eventually see how someone treats waitstaff, handles stress, pays bills, or reacts to boundariesprison courtship can be mostly narrative. It’s all voice, no dishes. All emotion, no grocery runs. All romance, no “can you please stop leaving wet towels on the bed?”
In that environment, it’s easier to confuse storytelling with truth and intensity with compatibility. If someone is lonely, socially isolated, or craving connection, the constant availability of letters and calls can feel like “finally, someone who gets me.” But what’s actually happening may be: “finally, someone who has time to study me.”
4) Distance feels safer: control, boundaries, and the paradox of prison romance
Here’s a counterintuitive reason that comes up repeatedly: prison can make a relationship feel emotionally safe because the partner is physically contained. That can appeal to someone who fears abandonment or betrayal. If your partner cannot suddenly walk out, cheat easily, or disappear into the night (because the night is locked), the relationship can feel “stable.”
Some people also find comfort in the predictability of regulated contact: scheduled calls, structured visits, written messages. The system does the boundary-setting for you. You can feel deeply connected without the full vulnerability of sharing a home, merging finances, or navigating everyday conflict.
Of course, “safe” here is an illusion. Emotional manipulation doesn’t require physical proximity. And if the offender is ever released, the relationship may collide with reality in a way that’s frighteningly abrupt.
5) The rescuer fantasy: “I can be the one who changes him”
Some people are drawn to relationships where they feel needed, essential, uniquely understood. With notorious offenders, that fantasy can inflate: “Everyone else sees a monster, but I see the wounded child underneath.” It’s compassion mixed with ego, hope mixed with denial.
This isn’t inherently malicious; many rescuers have big hearts. But big hearts can become big targets. If you’re predisposed to caretakingespecially if you’ve grown up in chaotic environments where love meant managing someone else’s emotions you may confuse emotional labor with intimacy.
In the most dangerous form, the rescuer fantasy turns into a mission: proving your worth by redeeming someone society has condemned. That mission can become identity, and once identity is on the line, leaving the relationship can feel like admitting failure.
6) Denial and “innocence stories”: when belief becomes a coping strategy
A number of spouses and fiancées publicly insist the offender is innocent. Sometimes that belief starts earlybefore conviction, before trial evidence is fully known. Sometimes it persists even after overwhelming proof, because accepting reality would shatter the relationship and the self-story built around it.
Denial can function like emotional anesthesia. If you “know” he didn’t do it, you don’t have to confront the horror of loving someone capable of extreme cruelty. If you “know” the victims are “lies,” you don’t have to face empathy that would make the relationship unbearable.
This is where cognitive dissonance kicks in: when two truths collide (“I love him” and “he did something unforgivable”), the brain often tries to reduce pain by bending one of the truths. That bending can look like conspiracy thinking, selective reading, or blaming the media.
7) Attachment wounds: when “unavailable” partners feel strangely familiar
People don’t choose attraction out of a menu like ordering lunch. Often, the nervous system chooses what feels familiareven when familiar isn’t healthy. If someone grew up with inconsistent caregiving, emotional neglect, or relationships where love had to be “earned,” they may be drawn to partners who are difficult to reach.
An incarcerated partner is the ultimate unavailable partner: present enough to create longing, absent enough to keep the chase alive. For someone with anxious attachment, the push-pull can feel like love. For someone with avoidant tendencies, distance can feel comfortable while still allowing romance at arm’s length.
Add low self-esteem and you get a brutal equation: “A ‘normal’ partner could leave me, but this one can’tso I’m safer.” It’s not logical; it’s protective wiring.
8) Trauma bonding and the addictive cycle of intermittent reward
Trauma bonds are often discussed in the context of abusive dynamics: intermittent kindness, sudden cruelty, apology, promise, repeat. When attention becomes unpredictable, the brain can start treating scraps of affection like jackpots.
With incarcerated offenders, the cycle can show up in a different costume: intense letters, then cold withdrawal; grand promises, then punishment; devotion demanded as proof of loyalty. The admirer feels responsible for keeping the connection alive, and every “good moment” feels like evidence the relationship is realand worth the suffering.
The most chilling part is how “rare kindness” can become a drug: if you only receive warmth after emotional pain, your brain may start chasing pain because it predicts warmth. That’s not romance; that’s conditioning.
9) Rebellion, identity, and belonging: the “us vs. them” bubble
Some relationships thrive on opposition. If family, friends, and society reject the relationship, that rejection can paradoxically strengthen it: “No one understands our love.” The couple becomes a two-person island, and the admirer may double down to prove everyone wrong.
In a world where identity is often performed, dating someone notorious can also become a form of rebellionagainst social rules, against “boring” norms, against past versions of oneself. It can feel like taking control of a narrative: “You don’t get to tell me who I am.”
And sometimes it’s about community. There are fan ecosystems around true crime and notorious cases. If someone finds belonging in those spaces, the relationship can become a passport into a groupone that offers validation when the outside world offers shame.
10) Practical incentivesand the offender’s advantage in manipulation
Not every motive is purely emotional. Marriage can sometimes offer practical benefits: easier visitation, a stronger claim to communication, access to information, or simply the perceived legitimacy of the relationship. For the admirer, it may feel like “proof” that the love is real.
But this is where the power imbalance matters. Many serial offenders are described by experts and researchers as skilled at deception, image management, and exploiting other people’s empathy. In prison, they have time to write, charm, strategize, and recruit. The admirer may be stepping into a psychological chess game while thinking it’s a love story.
A hard truth: some offenders cultivate relationships for attention, money, legal help, ego, or controlnot for love. And because they are practiced at playing roles, the admirer may not realize they’ve been cast as a supporting character.
What this often looks like in real life (without the movie soundtrack)
- Rapid emotional intimacy that grows faster than it reasonably should, fueled by constant messaging and intense disclosure.
- Selective information diets: the admirer avoids evidence, dismisses victims, or consumes only material that supports innocence.
- Isolation: friends and family pull away, and the relationship becomes the main source of validation.
- Identity fusion: “Supporting him” becomes the admirer’s purpose, sometimes overriding work, friendships, and self-care.
- Escalating commitment: moving, spending money, public defending, and eventually marriage as a way to stabilize the fantasy.
Notice what’s missing from that list: ordinary compatibility markers. Shared daily life. Mutual accountability. Consistent respect. Safety. Those are the foundations of healthy loveand they are very hard to build when the relationship is constructed around infamy and incarceration.
Healthy takeaways (even if you’re “just curious”)
If you feel pulled toward dangerous people…
Curiosity about dark psychology is common. Feeling magnetized by a dangerous person is a different signalone worth exploring with support. A therapist can help you untangle whether the attraction is about safety, control, trauma repetition, loneliness, thrill-seeking, or self-worth. The goal isn’t to shame you; it’s to protect you.
If someone you love is in a relationship like this…
Mockery usually backfires. Shame tends to glue people to their choices. A better approach is steady, nonjudgmental connection: “I’m here. I’m worried. You deserve to be safe.” Keep the door open while gently encouraging reality-based thinking.
If you’re in an abusive relationship (with anyone, incarcerated or not)…
Abuse isn’t defined by whether someone is famous, infamous, or free. If you’re being controlled, threatened, isolated, or harmed, you deserve help. In the U.S., the National Domestic Violence Hotline can be reached at 800-799-7233. If you’ve experienced sexual violence, RAINN’s National Sexual Assault Hotline is 800-656-4673. If you’re in immediate danger, call emergency services.
500-Word Experiences: Stories People Describe When Loving the Infamous
The experiences below are composite vignettes based on patterns commonly reported in interviews, documentaries, and clinical discussionsshared here to capture the emotional texture without exploiting any real individual’s private life.
Experience 1: “The letter felt like a warm room”
It often starts with a moment that doesn’t look dramatic. A documentary ends, the credits roll, and you’re left with a strange mix of fear and fascination. You tell yourself you’re interested in psychology, not him. But then you notice you’re searching for interviews, reading old articles, listening to podcasts, trying to understand the “how.” Understanding becomes empathy. Empathy becomes a feeling you can’t quite name.
When a letter arriveshandwritten, direct, oddly tenderit doesn’t feel like communicating with a monster. It feels like being seen. The words are focused on you. Your day. Your pain. Your hopes. And for someone who feels overlooked in ordinary life, that attention can hit like sunlight. You start waiting for the mail the way people wait for love.
Experience 2: “It was romance without the mess”
Some people describe prison courtship as strangely simple. There’s no pressure to share a kitchen or split rent or argue about in-laws. The relationship is pure conversation and anticipation. You can craft yourself on paper, and he can craft himself back. It’s not that you’re lyingmore that you’re editing. The version of you in a letter is calmer, kinder, more poetic. The version of him is remorseful, misunderstood, or spiritually transformed.
When friends say, “This is dangerous,” it can feel like they’re insulting your intelligence. You’re not naïve, you tell yourself. You’ve read everything. But “everything” often means: everything that still allows you to stay in the story. The parts that don’t fit get put in a mental closet you promise you’ll clean out later.
Experience 3: “Leaving felt like losing my whole identity”
The exitwhen it happensrarely looks like a clean breakup. It can feel like detox. You’ve built your days around calls, letters, visits, and defending your choice. Maybe you’ve lost friends. Maybe family stopped inviting you to holidays. Maybe your world shrank until the relationship was the main proof that you mattered.
Then a detail lands differently: a victim’s photo, a court document, a pattern of lies you can’t unsee. Or the tone changesmore controlling, more entitled, more punishing. You realize your empathy is being used like a remote control. And when you try to step back, you’re flooded with the fear that without this relationship, you’ll be nobody again.
People who leave often describe a second grief: not only losing a partner, but losing the story they lived inside. Healing becomes rebuilding ordinary lifefriendships, routines, dignity and learning that “ordinary” isn’t a sentence. It’s peace.